The U.S. statesâ tireless attempts at diminishing protections afforded under Public Law 86-272 (âP.L. 86-272â) have been headlining the state tax press for the last several years. For example, we saw, among other developments: (1) the MTC publish its revised Statement of Information (âMTC Statement of Informationâ) outlining proposed protected and unprotected activities under P.L. 86-272, including certain activities conducted over the Internet; (2) states (including California, New Jersey and New York) publish guidance seeking…
Latest Posts
- Public Law 86-272 â Federal Law Seeks to Giveth what the States Continue to Taketh Away with a Retroactive Twist
- Love and TaxesâWashingtonâs Proposed Dating App Tax
- Rhode Island Enters the Fray, Proposes Second in the Nation Digital Advertising Tax
- New Year, Same New YorkâBill Proposes Significant Tax Increases for Corporations
- Information Services: The Other Internet Transaction Tax in Texas
- California Continues to Challenge Economic Substance and Business Purpose
- Nebraska Supreme Court Affirms Denial of âDeemed Dividendâ Deduction For IRC §965 Income
- California Data Extraction Bill Advances in the Senate
Recent Posts
Joining a dating app may soon have tax implications in Washington. On April 8, 2025, House Bill 2071…
On February 6, 2025, Rhode Island lawmakers heard testimony about Rhode Island Governor Daniel McKeeâs proposed Digital Advertising…
Starting the new year off with legislation aimed directly at the pockets of corporate taxpayers, New York has…
Data processing gets top billing in Texas regarding internet taxation, but it is not the only relevant taxable…
In Matter of Gatewood Corp, OTA Case No. 19105425 (July 3, 2024), the California Office of Tax Appeals…
The one-time IRC §965 income inclusion for untaxed foreign earnings generated by a controlled foreign corporation (âCFCâ) is…