The Utah Supreme Court handed taxpayers a victory on October 5, 2018 when it issued a unanimous (5-0) decision in the closely-watched Utah State Tax Commission v. Seeâs Candies, Inc., 2018 UT 57 (Oct. 5, 2018). The Court affirmed the district courtâs holding that the Utah State Tax Commissionâs (âCommissionâ) discretionary authority to reallocate a taxpayerâs income under Utah Code Section 59-7-113 (âSection 113â) is limited by the âarmâs-lengthâ standard set forth in the federal…
The Utah Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Utah State Tax Comm’n v. See’s Candies Inc., Utah, No. 20160910-SC, which is an important case for whether Utah will respect armâs-length transfer pricing. During the hearing, the Utah State Tax Commission (âCommissionâ) argued that Internal Revenue Code (âIRCâ) § 482 should not limit its discretionary authority to reallocate income between related companies. The taxpayer, on the other hand, claimed the intercompany transactions at issue were at armâs length and therefore deductible.Â
The Utah Tax Court recently issued its decision in Seeâs Candies, Inc. v. Utah State Tax Commission, Case No. 140401556, holding that the âarmâs-lengthâ standard set forth in the federal treasury regulations relating to section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code (âIRCâ) controls for purposes of guiding the Utah State Tax Commission (âCommissionâ) in reallocating income pursuant to Utah Code section 59-7-113 (âSection 59-7-113â), which is nearly identical to section 482 of the IRC.