The Idaho Supreme Court recently affirmed a District Courtās judgment that the gain from the sale of a 78.54% membership interest in a limited liability company did not constitute ābusiness incomeā under Idaho Code section 63-3027.Ā In Noell Indus. Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commān, Docket No. 46941 (Idaho 2020), the court determined that āthis type of gain does not meet the definition of ābusiness incomeā under either the transactional test or functional test (including the unitary business test),ā and was therefore not apportionable income.
Pop quiz: when it comes to business earnings, the State of Texas imposes: (a) an income tax; (b) a business activity tax that is not an income tax; or (c) no tax at all. Good news (or bad news)āno matter which answer you chose, you may be right (or wrong).Ā Right now, the answer appears to be (b), but in a few months we may find out that the answer is actually (a), and barring a change of course by the State Legislature, the answer may be (c) in the near future.Ā One thing is clear; the Texas Franchise Tax (or āmargin tax,ā as it is colloquially known), is in a state of flux.