Tag

UDITPA

Browsing

The Idaho Supreme Court recently affirmed a District Courtā€™s judgment that the gain from the sale of a 78.54% membership interest in a limited liability company did not constitute ā€œbusiness incomeā€ under Idaho Code section 63-3027.Ā  In Noell Indus. Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commā€™n, Docket No. 46941 (Idaho 2020), the court determined that ā€œthis type of gain does not meet the definition of ā€˜business incomeā€™ under either the transactional test or functional test (including the unitary business test),ā€ and was therefore not apportionable income.

Pop quiz: when it comes to business earnings, the State of Texas imposes: (a) an income tax; (b) a business activity tax that is not an income tax; or (c) no tax at all. Good news (or bad news)ā€”no matter which answer you chose, you may be right (or wrong).Ā  Right now, the answer appears to be (b), but in a few months we may find out that the answer is actually (a), and barring a change of course by the State Legislature, the answer may be (c) in the near future.Ā  One thing is clear; the Texas Franchise Tax (or ā€œmargin tax,ā€ as it is colloquially known), is in a state of flux.